Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Efficacy of combined antigravity treadmill and conventional rehabilitation after hip fracture in patients with sarcopenia |
| Oh M-K, Yoo J-I, Byun H, Chun S-W, Lim S-K, Jang YJ, Lee CH |
| The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2020 Oct;75(10):e173-e181 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
BACKGROUND: To compare long-term effects of antigravity treadmill (AGT) combined with conventional rehabilitation (CR) and CR after hip fracture in patients with sarcopenia. METHODS: Forty-five patients were randomly allocated to AGT combined with CR (experimental group) or CR (control group) for 10 consecutive working days. Participants were evaluated prior to treatment, 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. Outcome measurement included Koval walking ability scores functional ambulatory category (FAC), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination, Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire Five-Dimensional Classification, Korean version of modified Barthel index, and grip strength. RESULTS: At 3 weeks and 3 months, the comparison of change scores in KOVAL between two groups revealed difference of 0.84 (95% CI -1.19 to -0.49; p for trend = 0.000) and 1.21 (95% CI -2.05 to -0.36; p for trend = 0.006), respectively. At 3 weeks, comparison of change score in FAC between two groups revealed a difference of 0.73 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.19; p for trend = 0.003). The comparison of change scores between two groups also showed a difference in the 6 months in KOVAL and in the 3 and 6 months in FAC. The comparison of changes in scores in BBS between two groups revealed difference of 11.63 (95% CI 5.85 to 17.40; p for trend = 0.001), 9.00 (95% CI 2.28 to 15.71; p for trend = 0.006), and 11.05 (95% CI 3.62 to 18.48; p for trend = 0.006), respectively, at each follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups were improved after intervention. As additional benefits were evident among those who carried out AGT, it may be appropriate for patients with sarcopenia after hip fracture surgery.
|