Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Digitally assisted versus conventional home-based rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial
Correia FD, Molinos M, Luis S, Carvalho D, Carvalho C, Costa P, Seabra R, Francisco G, Bento V, Lains J
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2022 Mar;101(3):237-249
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of a 12-week home-based digitally assisted rehabilitation program after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). against conventional home-based rehabilitation. DESIGN: The digital therapy (DT) group performed independent technology-assisted sessions complemented with 13 face-to-face sessions, and the conventional therapy (CT) group had conventional face-to-face physical therapy (30 sessions). Primary outcome was functional change between baseline and 12 weeks, measured through the Constant-Murley (CM) score. Secondary outcomes were the change in the QuickDASH scale and shoulder range of motion. RESULTS: Fifty participants enrolled; forty-one completed the 12-week program (23 DT group versus 18 CT group) and thirty-two (15 versus 17) were available for the 12-months follow-up assessment. No differences were found between groups regarding study endpoints at the end of the 12-week program. However, follow-up results revealed the superiority of the DT group for QuickDASH (p = 0.043), as well as an interaction between time and group in the CM score (p = 0.047) in favor of the DT group. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that digital therapeutics can be used to achieve similar, if not superior, short and long-term outcomes as conventional approaches after ARCR, while being far less human resource intensive than conventional care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help