Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of whole body electrostimulation associated with body weight training on functional capacity and body composition in inactive older people
Evangelista AL, Alonso AC, Ritti-Dias RM, Barros BM, de Souza CR, Braz TV, Bocalini DS, Greve JMD
Frontiers in Physiology 2021 Apr 1;12(638936):Epub
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of whole body electrostimulation (WB-EMS) with body weight training on functional fitness and body composition of older men. METHODS: Twenty physically inactive older men were randomized into: Control group (control), performed the body weight exercise training wearing electrostimulation clothing, but without receiving electrical current stimuli (n = 10), and body weight associated with whole body electrostimulation group (BW+WB-EMS), performed the body weight exercise training wearing electrostimulation clothing plus whole body electrostimulation (n = 10). The training sessions were performed twice a week for 6 weeks and included eight exercises using body weight, performed in two sets of eight repetitions. Physical function was assessed using a battery composed of seven tests, six derived from the Senior fitness test and a handgrip strength test. We also measured the muscle thickness (MT) of the biceps and triceps brachii and vastus lateralis. RESULTS: The BW+WB-EMS group presented increased (p < 0.05) performance in the 30-s chair stand test (10.2 +/- 3.3 versus 13.8 +/- 5.0 reps), arm curl (16.6 +/- 3.9 versus 19.9 +/- 6.1 reps), 6-min walk test (402 +/- 96 versus 500 +/- 104 m), and handgrip strength test (30 +/- 11 versus 32 +/- 11 kgf). The BW+WB-EMS group also presented increased MT (p < 0.05) in the biceps brachii (17.7 +/- 3.0 versus 21.4 +/- 3.4 mm), triceps brachial (14.7 +/- 3.6 versus 17.5 +/- 4.1 mm), and vastus lateralis muscles (15.1 +/- 2.6 versus 18.6 +/- 4.3 mm). Moderate correlations were found in arm curl (p = 0.011, r = 0.552) but not handgrip strength (p = 0.053, r = 0.439) with changes in the biceps MT. Moderate changes in the 6-min walk distance were significantly correlated with changes in vastus lateralis MT (p = 0.036, r = 0.471). There was a moderate correlation between the changes in the 30-s chair stand test (p = 0.006, r = 0.589) and changes in the vastus lateralis MT. Furthermore, although a moderate correlation (r = 0.438) was found between triceps MT and handgrip strength no significant difference (p = 0.053) was reported. Additionally, there were no statistical differences in any parameters for the control group. CONCLUSION: WB-EMS with body weight training increased functional fitness and MT in physically inactive older men.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help