Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects of movement velocity and training frequency of resistance exercise on functional performance in older adults: a randomised controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Richardson DL, Duncan MJ, Jimenez A, Juris PM, Clarke ND |
European Journal of Sport Science 2019 Mar;19(2):234-246 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects that high-velocity, low-load (HVLL) and low-velocity, high-load (LVHL) resistance exercise, performed once or twice-weekly, have on indices of functional performance (primary outcome), maximal strength, and body composition (secondary outcomes) in older adults. METHODS: In a randomised, controlled, multi-armed, parallel design, 54 moderately-highly active, but resistance exercise naive older adults (aged 60 to 79 years), attended baseline and post-10-week intervention assessment sessions. Physical and functional assessments were completed, and predicted one-repetition maximums (1-RM) were obtained for eight exercises. Participants were then randomised into one of five conditions: HVLL once-weekly (HVLL1: n = 11) or twice-weekly (HVLL2: n = 11), LVHL once-weekly (LVHL1: n = 10) or twice-weekly (LVHL2: n = 11), no-exercise control condition (CON: n = 11). The HVLL conditions completed 3 sets of 14 repetitions at 40% 1-RM and the LVHL conditions, 3 sets of 7 repetitions at 80% 1-RM. In total, 50 participants completed all testing and were included in analyses. RESULTS: Only LVHL2 improved 30-sec chair stand performance (p = 0.035; g = 0.89), arm curls (p = 0.011; g = 1.65) and grip-strength (p = 0.015; g = 0.34) compared to CON. LVHL2 improved maximal strength compared to CON for 7/8 exercises (p < 0.05). Whereas, LVHL1 and HVLL2 only improved seated row and chest press compared to CON (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Possibly due to the lower intensity nature of the HVLL conditions, LVHL, twice-weekly was most beneficial for improving functional performance and strength in moderately-highly active older adults. Therefore, we recommend that exercise professionals ensure resistance exercise sessions have sufficient intensity of effort and volume, in order to maximise functional performance and strength gains in older adults.
|