Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Two-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation versus outpatient acceptance and commitment therapy for sick listed workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders |
Aasdahl L, Vasseljen O, Gismervik SO, Johnsen R, Fimland MS |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2021 Dec;31(4):721-728 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
PURPOSE: There is a lack of results on long-term effects of return to work interventions. We previously reported that an inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation program (I-MORE) was more effective in reducing sickness absence and facilitating return to work (RTW) at 12 months follow-up compared to an outpatient program that consisted mainly of acceptance and commitment therapy (O-ACT). We now report the 2-year outcome data. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial with parallel groups. Participants were 18 to 60 years old, sick listed with musculoskeletal, common mental or general/unspecified disorders. I-MORE lasted 3.5 weeks and consisted of ACT, physical training and work-related problem solving. O-ACT consisted mainly of 6 weekly sessions (2.5 h. each) of ACT in groups. Outcomes were cumulated number of days on medical benefits and time until sustainable RTW (1 month without medical benefits) during 2-years of follow-up, measured by registry data. RESULTS: For the 166 randomized participants, the median number of days on medical benefits was 159 (IQR 59 to 342) for I-MORE versus 249 days (IQR 103 to 379; Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.07), for O-ACT. At 2 years, 40% in I-MORE received long-term benefits (work assessment allowance) versus 51% in O-ACT. The crude hazard ratio (HR) for sustainable RTW was 1.59 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.42, p = 0.03) and the adjusted HR 1.77 (95% CI 1.14 to 2.75, p = 0.01), in favor of I-MORE. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year outcomes show that I-MORE had long-term positive effects on increasing work participation for individuals sick listed with musculoskeletal and mental disorders. Further follow-up and economic evaluations should be performed.
|