Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Two-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation versus outpatient acceptance and commitment therapy for sick listed workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders
Aasdahl L, Vasseljen O, Gismervik SO, Johnsen R, Fimland MS
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2021 Dec;31(4):721-728
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: There is a lack of results on long-term effects of return to work interventions. We previously reported that an inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation program (I-MORE) was more effective in reducing sickness absence and facilitating return to work (RTW) at 12 months follow-up compared to an outpatient program that consisted mainly of acceptance and commitment therapy (O-ACT). We now report the 2-year outcome data. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial with parallel groups. Participants were 18 to 60 years old, sick listed with musculoskeletal, common mental or general/unspecified disorders. I-MORE lasted 3.5 weeks and consisted of ACT, physical training and work-related problem solving. O-ACT consisted mainly of 6 weekly sessions (2.5 h. each) of ACT in groups. Outcomes were cumulated number of days on medical benefits and time until sustainable RTW (1 month without medical benefits) during 2-years of follow-up, measured by registry data. RESULTS: For the 166 randomized participants, the median number of days on medical benefits was 159 (IQR 59 to 342) for I-MORE versus 249 days (IQR 103 to 379; Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.07), for O-ACT. At 2 years, 40% in I-MORE received long-term benefits (work assessment allowance) versus 51% in O-ACT. The crude hazard ratio (HR) for sustainable RTW was 1.59 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.42, p = 0.03) and the adjusted HR 1.77 (95% CI 1.14 to 2.75, p = 0.01), in favor of I-MORE. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year outcomes show that I-MORE had long-term positive effects on increasing work participation for individuals sick listed with musculoskeletal and mental disorders. Further follow-up and economic evaluations should be performed.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help