Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of a structured counselling-based intervention to improve physical activity behaviour of adolescents and young adult cancer survivors -- the randomized phase II Motivate AYA -- MAYA trial [with consumer summary]
Salchow J, Koch B, Mann J, von Grundherr J, Elmers S, Dwinger S, Escherich G, Vettorazzi E, Reer R, Sinn M, Baumann F, Bokemeyer C, Stein A, Jensen W
Clinical Rehabilitation 2021 Aug;35(8):1164-1174
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a structured counselling-based intervention increases vigorous physical activity behaviour of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. DESIGN: Randomized controlled phase II trial. SETTING: University Cancer Center Hamburg, Germany. SUBJECTS: Eighty-nine participants (mean age 24.1 +/- 6.3) were randomized to control (n = 44) or intervention group (n = 45). INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group was consulted about physical activity behaviour via interview (week 0), and telephone counselling (weeks 1, 3 and 12). The control group only received general physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors (week 0). MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of participants with 9 metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours per week of vigorous activity post-intervention, measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included assessing physical activity behaviour (eg, amount and type of physical activity) and quality of life. Assessments were completed in weeks 0 (baseline), 12 (post-intervention) and 52 (follow-up). RESULTS: Sixty-nine participants completed the post-intervention- and 47 the follow-up-assessment. The rate of participants performing vigorous physical activity increased from baseline to post-intervention for both without differing significantly (p = 0.541). Both increased their total metabolic equivalent from baseline to post-intervention (intervention group from 55.2 +/- 43.7 to 61.7 +/- 29.4, control group from 75.3 +/- 81.4 to 88.3 +/- 80.2). At follow-up the intervention group (73.7 +/- 80.2) was more active than baseline when compared to the control group (78.5 +/- 50.0). CONCLUSIONS: A structured counselling-based physical activity intervention did not significantly impact the level of vigorous physical activity behaviour in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help