Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effectiveness of a specialised breathlessness service for patients with advanced disease in Germany: a pragmatic fast-track randomised controlled trial (BreathEase)
Schunk M, Le L, Syunyaeva Z, Haberland B, Tanzler S, Mansmann U, Schwarzkopf L, Seidl H, Streitwieser S, Hofmann M, Muller T, Weis T, Morawietz P, Rehfuess EA, Huber RM, Berger U, Bausewein C
The European Respiratory Journal 2021 Aug;58(2):2002139
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the Munich Breathlessness Service (MBS), integrating palliative care, respiratory medicine and physiotherapy, was tested in the BreathEase trial in patients with chronic breathlessness in advanced disease and their carers. METHODS: BreathEase was a single-blinded randomised controlled fast-track trial. The MBS was attended for 5 to 6 weeks; the control group started the MBS after 8 weeks of standard care. Randomisation was stratified by cancer and the presence of a carer. Primary outcomes were patients' mastery of breathlessness (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) Mastery), quality of life (CRQ QoL), symptom burden (Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS)) and carer burden (Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)). Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were conducted with hierarchical testing. Effectiveness was investigated by linear regression on change scores, adjusting for baseline scores and stratification variables. Missing values were handled with multiple imputation. RESULTS: 92 patients were randomised to the intervention group and 91 patients were randomised to the control group. Before the follow-up assessment after 8 weeks (T1), 17 and five patients dropped out from the intervention and control groups, respectively. Significant improvements in CRQ Mastery of 0.367 (95% CI 0.065 to 0.669) and CRQ QoL of 0.226 (95% CI 0.012 to 0.440) score units at T1 in favour of the intervention group were seen in the ITT analyses (n = 183), but not in IPOS. Exploratory testing showed nonsignificant improvements in ZBI. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate positive effects of the MBS in reducing burden caused by chronic breathlessness in advanced illness across a wide range of patients. Further evaluation in subgroups of patients and with a longitudinal perspective is needed.
Permission granted by European Respiratory Society Journals Ltd.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help