Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effectiveness of mirror therapy for phantom limb pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Xie H-M, Zhang K-X, Wang S, Wang N, Wang N, Li X, Huang L-P
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022 May;103(5):988-997
systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of mirror therapy (MT) for phantom limb pain (PLP). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, CNKI, and Wanfang Data were used to search for studies published up to March 31, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the pain intensity of MT for PLP were performed. A total of 2,094 articles were found. Among them, 10 were eligible for the final analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: The quality of the RCTs was assessed using the PEDro scale by two independent reviewers. Outcome data were pooled according to follow-up intervals (1, 3, 6, and 12 months). Duration times were used as a basis for distinguishing subgroups. The primary evaluation was by visual analog scale (VAS). The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant decrease in pain in the MT group versus the control group within 1 month (I2 = 0%, SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.13, p = 0.007). The patients with pain for longer than one year benefited more from MT (I2 = 0%, SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.07, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: MT has beneficial effects for patients suffering from PLP in the short-term, as evidenced by their improved pain scores. There was no evidence that MT had a long-term effect, but that may be a product of limited data. For patients with long-term PLP, MT may be an effective treatment.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help