Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Six versus 12 weeks of outpatient physical therapy including progressive resistance training in cognitively intact older adults after hip fracture: a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
Overgaard JA, Kallemose T, Mangione KK, Kristensen MT |
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2022 Jul;77(7):1455-1462 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Recovery of function and regaining muscle strength is challenging after hip fracture. We compared the effectiveness of a 12 versus 6-weeks outpatient physical therapy program with progressive resistive training (PRT) to increase strength and physical performance. METHODS: This parallel, superiority, 2-group randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 clinics enrolled community-dwelling, cognitively intact older adults (+60 years) with a surgical repair of a hip fracture and no major medical conditions. Participants received 12 or 6-weeks of PRT and standardized physical therapy, twice weekly. Pain was monitored throughout. Primary outcome was the change in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) from baseline to 12-weeks follow-up. Randomization via a computer-generated allocation sequence was implemented using sealed, sequentially numbered opaque envelopes and assessors were blinded to group assignment. RESULTS: Participants (81% women) with a mean (SD) age of 77 (8.1) years were enrolled at an average of 18 days post-hip fracture surgery and randomized into a 12-week group (n = 50) or a 6-week group (n = 50). A mean (SD) change score in the 6MWT of 143.8 (81.1) and 161.5 (84.1) meters found in the 12 and 6-week group, respectively (both exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 55 meters). The mean between-group difference was -17.7 (95%CI -50.1 to 14.8) meter. Pain during training did not exceed moderate levels nor increase as training intensity increased. CONCLUSION: Twelve weeks of physical therapy with PRT was not superior to 6-weeks in improving walking distance. Hip fracture-related pain was relatively low and indicated strength testing and training was well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01174589.
|