OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the treatment with intermittent pneumatic compression plus multilayer bandages is not inferior to classical trimodal therapy with manual lymphatic drainage in the decongestive lymphedema treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, non-inferiority, controlled study to compare the efficacy of three physical therapies' regimens in the decongestive lymphatic therapy. PARTICIPANTS: 194 lymphedema patients, stage II to III with excess volume > 10% were stratified within upper and lower limb and then randomized to one of the three treatment groups. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. INTERVENTION: all patients were prescribed 20 sessions of the following regimens: group A (control group): manual lymphatic drainage plus intermittent pneumatic compression plus bandages; group B: pneumatic lymphatic drainage plus intermittent pneumatic compression plus bandages; and group C: only intermittent pneumatic compression plus bandages. END-POINT: Percentage reduction in excess volume (PREV). RESULTS: All patients improved after treatment. Global mean of PREV was 63.9%, without significant differences between the groups. The lower confidence interval of the mean difference in PREV between group B and group A, and between group C and group A were below 15%, thus meeting the non-inferiority criterion. Most frequent adverse events were discomfort and lymphangitis, without differences between groups. A greater baseline edema, an upper-limb lymphedema and a history of dermatolymphangitis were independent predictive factors of worse response in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Decongestive lymphatic therapy performed only with intermittent pneumatic compression plus bandages is not inferior to the traditional trimodal therapy with manual lymphatic drainage. This approach did not increase adverse events.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher