Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The effects of a physical and cognitive training intervention versus physical training alone on older adults' physical activity: a randomized controlled trial with extended follow-up during COVID-19
Savikangas T, Tormakangas T, Tirkkonen A, Alen M, Fielding RA, Kivipelto M, Rantalainen T, Stigsdotter Neely A, Sipila S
PLoS ONE 2021 Oct;16(10):e0258559
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Executive functions underlie self-regulation and are thus important for physical activity and adaptation to new situations. The aim was to investigate, if yearlong physical and cognitive training (PTCT) had greater effects on physical activity among older adults than physical training (PT) alone, and if executive functions predicted physical activity at baseline, after six (6m) and twelve months (12m) of the interventions, one-year post-intervention follow-up and an extended follow-up during COVID-19 lockdown. METHODS: Data from a single-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (PASSWORD-study, ISRCTN52388040) were utilized. Participants were 70 to 85 years old community-dwelling men and women from Jyvaskyla, Finland. PT (n = 159) included supervised resistance, walking and balance training, home-exercises and self-administered moderate activity. PTCT (n = 155) included PT and cognitive training targeting executive functions on a computer program. Physical activity was assessed with a one-item, seven-scale question. Executive functions were assessed with color-word Stroop, Trail Making Test (TMT) B-A and Letter Fluency. Changes in physical activity were modeled with multinomial logistic models and the impact of executive functions on physical activity with latent change score models. RESULTS: No significant group-by-time interaction was observed for physical activity (p > 0.1). The subjects were likely to select an activity category higher than baseline throughout the study (pooled data B = 0.720 to 1.614, p < 0.001 to 0.046). Higher baseline Stroop predicted higher physical activity through all subsequent time-points (pooled data B = 0.011 to 0.013, p = 0.015 to 0.030). Higher baseline TMT B-A predicted higher physical activity at 6m (pooled data B = 0.007, p = 0.006) and during COVID-19 (B = 0.005, p = 0.030). In the PT group, higher baseline Letter Fluency predicted higher physical activity at 12m (B = -0.028, p = 0.030) and follow-up (B = -0.042, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive training did not have additive effects over physical training alone on physical activity, but multicomponent training and higher executive function at baseline may support adaptation to and maintenance of a physically active lifestyle among older adults.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help