Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative medicine versus concussion education in treating student athletes with acute concussion symptoms |
| Yao SC, Zwibel H, Angelo N, Leder A, Mancini J |
| The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2020 Sep;120(9):607-614 |
| clinical trial |
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
CONTEXT: Concussion, a type of mild traumatic brain injury, is a disruption in normal brain function due to head injury. New-onset symptoms from concussion vary, likely depending on the areas of the head and neck affected; they can be severe and debilitating. Current treatment options are limited and difficult to individualize. Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) can aid musculoskeletal restrictions that can potentially improve concussion symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To assess concussion symptom number and severity in participants with concussion who received either OMM or an educational intervention. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the New York Institute of Technology Academic Health Care Center. Patients presenting to the center with concussion-like symptoms due to recent head injury within the previous 7 days provided consent and were randomized into 2 intervention groups, receiving either 1 OMM treatment (n = 16) or 1 concussion education intervention (n = 15). Participants were assessed before and after the intervention with the validated Symptom Concussion Assessment Tool fifth edition (SCAT-5) for quantification of number of symptoms and their severity. Collected data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants were enrolled in the study; after 1 control participant was excluded due to incomplete data, 30 patient records were analyzed. The OMM intervention group had a significant decrease in symptom number (p = 0.002) and symptom severity (p = 0.001) compared with the concussion education group. CONCLUSION: When used in the acute setting, OMM significantly decreased concussion symptom number and severity compared with concussion education. This study demonstrates that integration of OMM using a physical examinationguided, individualized approach is safe and effective in the management of new-onset symptoms of uncomplicated concussions. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02750566).
|