Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Breathing exercises versus strength exercises through telerehabilitation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients in the acute phase: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Rodriguez-Blanco C, Bernal-Utrera C, Anarte-Lazo E, Saavedra-Hernandez M, de-la-Barrera-Aranda E, Serrera-Figallo MA, Gonzalez-Martin M, Gonzalez-Gerez JJ
Clinical Rehabilitation 2022 Apr;36(4):486-497
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two different exercise-based programs through telerehabilitation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, parallel, double-blinded, three-arm clinical trial. SETTING: Patients' homes through telerehabilitation devices. SUBJECTS: Subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 in the acute phase. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were divided into three groups: breathing exercises group, strength exercises group or no treatment/control group. MAIN MEASURES: We analysed visual analogue scale for fatigue, 6-minute walking test, 30-seconds sit-to-stand test, Multidimensional Dyspnoea-12 Questionnaire and Borg Scale at baseline and 14 days later. RESULTS: From 93 subjects recruited, 88 were enrolled, and 77 patients (mean (SD) age 39.40 (11.71)) completed the 14-days intervention and were included in the analysis: 26 in strength exercises group, 29 in breathing exercises group and 22 in control group. The intergroup analysis shows significant differences between the study groups and control group in all variables (p < 0.05); Borg Scale, multidimensional dyspnoea-12 questionnaire (pre-post intervention score strength exercises group 7.85 (6.82) to 4.54 (4.82), breathing exercises group 11.04 (6.49) to 5.32 (3.63), control group 10.27 (6.49) to 10.59 (6.58)), visual analogue scale for fatigue, 6-minute walking test and 30-seconds sit-to-stand test (pre-post intervention score strength exercises group 12.19 (4.42) to 13.58 (5.37), breathing exercises group 11.18 (3.42) to 12.79 (4.00), control group 10.45 (2.15) to 9.86 (1.88)). The greatest effect sizes were found in the variables Borg Scale (R2 = 0.548) and Multidimensional Dyspnoea-12 Questionnaire (R2 = 0.475). CONCLUSIONS: Strength exercises group and breathing exercises group obtained significant improvements in fatigue, dyspnoea, perceived effort, and physical state, compared to control group, although the greatest benefits were found for dyspnoea and aerobic capacity in breathing exercises group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help