Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
A comparison of the effect of physical activity and cognitive training on dual-task performance in older adults |
Vrinceanu T, Blanchette C-A, Intzandt B, Lussier M, Pothier K, Vu TTM, Nigam A, Bosquet L, Karelis AD, Li KZH, Berryman N, Bherer L |
The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2022 Jun;77(6):1069-1079 |
clinical trial |
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: Studies suggest that cognitive training and physical activity can improve age-related deficits in dual-task performances. However, both of these interventions have never been compared in the same study. This paper investigates the improvement in dual-task performance in two types of exercise training groups and a cognitive training group, and explores if there are specific dual-task components that are more sensitive or more likely to improve following each type of training. METHODS: Seventy-eight healthy inactive participants over the age of 60 (mean 69.98, SD 5.56) were randomized to one of three 12-week training programs: aerobic (AET) = 26, gross motor abilities (GMA) = 27, cognition (COG) = 25. Before and after the training program, the participants underwent physical fitness tests, and cognitive evaluations involving a computerized cognitive dual-task. The AET consisted of high and low intensity aerobic training, the GMA of full-body exercises focusing on agility, balance, coordination, and stretching, and the COG of tablet-based exercises focusing on executive functions. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA on reaction time data revealed a group x time interaction (F[2,75] = 11.91, p < 0.01) with COG having the greatest improvement, followed by a significant improvement in the GMA group. Secondary analysis revealed the COG to also improve the intraindividual variability in reaction time (F[1,24] = 8.62, p < 0.01), while the GMA improved the dual-task cost (F[1,26] = 12.74, p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: The results show that physical and cognitive training can help enhance dual-task performance by improving different aspects of the task, suggesting that different mechanisms are in play.
|