Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Center based versus home based geriatric rehabilitation on sarcopenia components: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Li Q, Wang F, Liu X, Zhong H, Huang F, Zhu P
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022 Aug;103(8):1663-1675
systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the available evidence on the components of sarcopenia in geriatric rehabilitation, and to examine whether changes in different settings are associated with sarcopenia. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from initiation to August 30th, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of older adults receiving geriatric rehabilitation that included strength exercise training. DATA EXTRACTION: The following study contents were extracted: study design, patient characteristics, sample size, description of the rehabilitation setting, follow-up timepoint and outcomes. The main outcomes were muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance. DATA SYNTHESIS: Weighted mean difference for 'Timed up-and-go' score and standardized mean difference for other parameters were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: Center-based geriatric rehabilitation improved lower limb strength and Timed Up-and-Go Test score to a greater extent than home-based geriatric rehabilitation in elderly people. Center-based training seems to show a minor superior effect on gait speed in prolonged follow-up rather than at the endpoint of intervention. To draw a stronger conclusion, further high-quality trials with standard protocols and longer follow-up are needed.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help