Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Home training with or without joint mobilization compared to no treatment: a randomized controlled trial |
Eliason A, Werner S, Engstrom B, Harringe M |
Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2022 Feb;34(2):153-160 |
clinical trial |
9/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
PURPOSE: To investigate if joint mobilization in patients with subacromial pain syndrome has additional benefits to a home training program on shoulder function and pain, and to compare home training to no physical therapy. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine primary care patients (mean age 45 years) with subacromial pain syndrome during an average of 23 weeks. Home training was performed twice a day during a 12 week period. One of the intervention groups received add-on shoulder joint mobilization to the home training. A third group did not receive any physical therapy. Constant-Murley score, pain and active range of motion was evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months. RESULTS: The total Constant-Murley score revealed no significant differences between groups at any time point. All groups improved over time. The add-on joint mobilization group reached clinical important change at 12 weeks. The subscale pain showed that both intervention groups reported less pain after 12 weeks compared to the reference group. CONCLUSION: Home training is not superior to no treatment evaluated with the total Constant-Murley score. However, home training with or without add-on joint mobilization may decrease pain compared to no treatment.
|