BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of early versus delayed introduction of lengthening (ie, eccentric strengthening) exercises in addition to an established rehabilitation programme on return to sport duration for acute hamstring injuries in a randomised controlled superiority trial. METHODS: 90 male participants (age 18 to 36 years, median 26 years) with an MRI-confirmed acute hamstring injury were randomised into an early lengthening (at day 1 of rehabilitation) group or a delayed lengthening (after being able to run at 70% of maximal speed) group. Both groups received an established rehabilitation programme. The primary outcome was time to return to sport (ie, time from injury to full unrestricted training and/or match play). The secondary outcome was reinjury rate within 12 months after return to sport. Other outcomes at return to sport included the Askling H-test, hamstring strength, clinical examination and readiness questions. RESULTS: The return to sport in the early lengthening group was 23 (IQR 16 to 35) days and 33 (IQR 23 to 40) days in the delayed lengthening group. For return to sport (in days), the adjusted HR for the early lengthening group compared with the delayed lengthening group was 0.95 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.60, p = 0.84). There was no significant difference between groups for reinjury rates within 2 months (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.18 to 5.0, p = 0.94), from 2 to 6 months (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.17 to 23.3, p = 0.58), and 6 to 12 months (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.05 to 6.6, p = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Accelerating the introduction of lengthening exercises in the rehabilitation of hamstring injury in male athletes did not improve the time to return to sport nor the risk of reinjury.
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher