Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of automatic mechanical peripheral stimulation on gait biomechanics in older adults with Parkinson's disease: a randomized crossover clinical trial
Marques NR, Kuroda MH, Moreno VC, Zamuner AR, Barbieri FA
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2022 Jun;34(6):1323-1331
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Automated mechanical peripheral stimulation (AMPS) is a rehabilitation technique suggested to correct gait abnormalities on Parkinson's disease. Although previous studies have suggested increments in functional performance and gait speed after AMPS intervention, little is known about its effect on gait biomechanics. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of an AMPS session on functional performance and gait biomechanics in subjects with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects aged 67 +/- 3 years old participated in this study. Kinematics and muscle activation were recorded during walking at a preferred gait speed before and after AMPS and sham interventions. Footswitches sensors were used to record the kinematic parameters. Electromyographic (EMG) signals of tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) were recorded. Timed up and go (TUG) test and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were performed to assess functional performance. RESULTS: GL activation increased after AMPS intervention before and after heel strike (p = 0.04; p < 0.01) and before and after toe-off (p = 0.013; p = 0.038). Also, after AMPS intervention, TA activation increased after heel strike (p = 0.007); and after sham intervention, TA activation reduced before and after heel strike (p = 0.038; and p = 0.007) and before toe-off (p = 0.013). The time of TUG test was shorter after AMPS intervention (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: AMPS intervention changed the EMG activation of ankle muscles during walking and functional performance. However, AMPS intervention did not change gait kinematics.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help