Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects of strength training on sleep parameters of adolescents: a randomized controlled trial |
Santiago LCS, Lyra MJ, Germano-Soares AH, Lins-Filho OL, Queiroz DR, Prazeres TMP, Mello MT, Pedrosa RP, Falcao APST, Santos MAM |
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2022 May;36(5):1222-1227 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
This study aimed to examine the effects of 12 weeks of strength training (ST) on sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in adolescents with sleep complaints. Thirty adolescents were randomly assigned to 2 groups: ST group (ST, n = 18) and control group (CG, n = 12). Anthropometric, body composition, one-repetition maximum test, and sleep parameters, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were evaluated. Training consisted of 55 min per day (3 times a week, for 12 weeks), 3 sets of 10 to 12 repetitions with a 1-minute rest interval between sets and exercises. Baseline and postintervention differences were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations and the effect size (ES) with Cohen's d coefficient. Significance was set at (p < 0.05). After 12 weeks of ST, a significant decrease in the PSQI score (7.3 +/- 0.7 versus 5.1 +/- 0.6; ES = 4.10) was observed in the ST group, but not in the CG (6.3 +/- 0.8 versus 7.4 +/- 0.7; ES = 1.53). A significant decrease in ESS score was found in the ST group (10.1 +/- 0.7 versus 8.2 +/- 0.7; ES = 3.08), without differences in the CG (10.7 +/- 0.8 versus 11.0 +/- 0.7; ES = 0.56). The ST group presented increased total sleep duration (hours per min) (6.2 +/- 0.2 versus 6.9 +/- 0.2; ES = 3.60), but not the CG (7.0 +/- 0.2 versus 6.8 +/- 0.1; ES = 1.32). Individual analyses showed = 67% of adolescents experienced a reduction in PSQI (8.3; 95% CI 6.8 to 10.1) and ESS (8.3; 95% CI 6.7 to 9.9) scores after ST, whereas only = 17% of control subjects presented reduced scores (PSQI 11.1; 95% CI 9.5 to 12.9 and ESS 11.0; 95% CI 9.4 to 12.6). Strength training improved sleep quality and increased total sleep duration.
|