Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

A comparative study of treatment interventions for patellar tendinopathy: a secondary cost-effectiveness analysis
Fernandez-Sanchis D, Lopez-Royo MP, Jimenez-Sanchez C, Herrero P, Gomez-Barrera M, Calvo S
Acupuncture in Medicine 2022 Dec;40(6):516-523
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of three patellar tendinopathy treatments. DESIGN: Secondary (cost-effectiveness) analysis of a blinded, randomised controlled trial, with follow-up at 10 and 22 weeks. SETTINGS: Recruitment was performed in sport clubs. The diagnosis and the intervention were carried out at San Jorge University. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were adults between 18 and 45 years (n = 48) with patellar tendinopathy. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received percutaneous needle electrolysis, dry needling or sham needling, all of which were combined with eccentric exercise. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs, quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated for each group. RESULTS: The total cost per session was similar in the three groups: 9.46 for the percutaneous needle electrolysis group; 9.44 for the dry needling group; and 8.96 for the sham group. The percutaneous needle electrolysis group presented better cost-effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life years and 96% and 93% probability of being cost-effective compared to the sham and dry needling groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that percutaneous needle electrolysis has a greater probability of being cost-effective than sham or dry needling treatment.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help