Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of midfoot joint mobilization on perceived ankle-foot function in chronic ankle instability: a crossover clinical trial
Jaffri A, Fraser JJ, Koldenhoven RM, Hertel J
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2022 Jun;31(8):1031-1040
clinical trial
This trial has not yet been rated.

CONTEXT: To investigate the effects of midfoot joint mobilization and a 1-week home exercise program, compared with a sham intervention, and home exercise program on pain, patient-reported outcomes, ankle-foot joint mobility, and neuromotor function in young adults with chronic ankle instability. DESIGN: Crossover clinical trial. METHODS: Twenty participants with chronic ankle instability were instructed in a stretching, strengthening, and balance home exercise program and were randomized a priori to receive either midfoot joint mobilizations (forefoot supination, cuboid glide, and plantar first tarsometatarsal) or a sham laying of hands on the initial visit. Changes in foot morphology, joint mobility, strength, dynamic balance, and patient-reported outcomes assessing pain, physical, and psychological function were assessed pre to post treatment and 1 week following post treatment. Participants crossed over to receive the alternate treatment and were assessed pre to post treatment and 1 week following. Linear modeling was used to assess changes in outcomes. RESULTS: Participants demonstrated significantly greater perceived improvement immediately following midfoot mobilization in the single assessment numeric evaluation (sham: 5.0% (10.2%); mobilization: 43.9% (26.2%); beta: 6.8; p < 0.001; adj R2: 0.17; Hedge g: 2.09), and global rating of change (sham: -0.1 (1.1); mobilization: 1.1 (3.0); beta: 1.8; p = 0.01; adj R2: 0.12; Hedge g: 0.54), and greater improved 1-week outcomes in rearfoot inversion mobility (sham: 4.4 degree (8.4 degree); mobilization: -1.6degree (6.1 degree); beta: -6.37; p = 0.01; adj R2: 0.19; Hedge g: 0.81), plantar flexion mobility (sham: 2.7 degree (6.4 degree); mobilization: -1.7 degree (4.3 degree); beta: -4.36; p = 0.02; adj R2: 0.07; Hedge g: 0.80), and posteromedial dynamic balance (sham: 2.4% (5.9%); mobilization: 6.0% (5.4%); beta: 3.88; p = 0.04; adj R2: 0.10; Hedge g: 0.59) compared to the sham intervention. CONCLUSION: Greater perceived improvement and physical signs were observed following midfoot joint mobilization.
Copyright Human Kinetics. Reprinted with permission from Human Kinetics (Champaign, IL).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help