Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Acute effects of a single bout of exercise therapy on knee acoustic emissions in patients with osteoarthritis: a double-blinded, randomized controlled crossover trial |
Kalo K, Niederer D, Schmitt M, Vogt L |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2022 Jul 11;23(657):Epub |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is associated with higher kinetic friction in the knee joint, hence increased acoustic emissions during motion. Decreases in compressive load and improvements in movement quality might reduce this friction and, thus, sound amplitude. We investigated if an exercise treatment acutely affects knee joint sounds during different activities of daily life. METHODS: Eighteen participants with knee osteoarthritis (aged 51.8 +/- 7.3 years; 14 females) were included in this randomized crossover trial. A neuromuscular exercise intervention and a placebo laser needle acupuncture treatment were performed. Before and after both interventions, knee joint sounds were measured during three different activities of daily living (standing up/sitting down, walking, descending stairs) by means of vibroarthrography. The mean amplitude (dB) and the median power frequency (MPF, Hz) were assessed at the medial tibial plateau and the patella. Differences in knee acoustic emissions between placebo and exercise interventions were calculated by analyses of covariance. RESULTS: Controlled for participant's age, knee demanding activity level and osteoarthritis stage, the conditions significantly differed in their impact on the MPF (mean (+/- SD) pre-post-differences standing up placebo: 9.55 (+/- 29.15) Hz/exercise 13.01 (+/- 56.06) Hz, F = 4.9, p < 0.05) and the amplitude (standing up placebo 0.75 (+/- 1.43) dB / exercise 0.51 (+/- 4.68) dB, F = 5.0, p < 0.05; sitting down placebo 0.07 (+/- 1.21) dB / exercise -0.16 (+/- 0.36) dB, F = 4.7, p < 0.05) at the tibia. There were no differences in the MPF and amplitude during walking and descending stairs (p > 0.05). At the patella, we found significant differences in the MPF during walking (placebo 0.08 (+/- 1.42) Hz/ exercise 15.76 (+/- 64.25) Hz, F = 4.8, p < 0.05) and in the amplitude during descending stairs (placebo 0.02 (+/- 2.72) dB/ exercise -0.73 (+/- 2.84) dB, F = 4.9, p < 0.05). There were no differences in standing up/ sitting down for both parameters, nor in descending stairs for the MPF and walking for the amplitude (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The MPF pre-post differences of the exercise intervention were higher compared to the MPF pre-post differences of the placebo treatment. The amplitude pre-post differences were lower in the exercise intervention. In particular, the sound amplitude might be an indicator for therapy effects in persons with knee osteoarthritis.
|