Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Acute effects of virtual reality treadmill training on gait and cognition in older adults: a randomized controlled trial
Zukowski LA, Shaikh FD, Haggard AV, Hamel RN
PLoS ONE 2022 Nov;17(11):e0276989
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: Everyday walking often involves walking with divided attention (ie, dual-tasking). Exercise interventions for older adults should mimic these simultaneous physical and cognitive demands. This proof-of-concept study had a two-fold purpose: (1) identify acute cognitive and gait benefits of a single session of virtual reality treadmill training (VRTT), relative to conventional treadmill training (CTT), and (2) identify differences between those who reduced dual-task costs (ie, responders) on gait or cognition and those who did not, after the session. METHODS: Sixty older adults were randomized to complete a single 30-minute session of VRTT (n = 30, 71.2 +/- 6.5 years, 22 females) or CTT (n = 30, 72.0 +/- 7.7 years, 21 females). Pre- and post-exercise session, participants performed single-task walking, single-task cognitive, and dual-task walking trials while gait and cognition were recorded. Gait variables were gait speed and gait speed variability. Cognition variables were response reaction time, response accuracy, and cognitive throughput. Dual-task effects (DTE) on gait and cognition variables were also calculated. RESULTS: Post-exercise, there were no group differences (all p > 0.05). During single- and dual-task trials, both groups walked faster (single-task: F[1, 58] = 9.560, p = 0.003; dual-task: F[1, 58] = 19.228, p < 0.001), responded more quickly (single-task: F[1, 58] = 5.054, p = 0.028; dual-task: F(1, 58) = 8.543, p = 0.005), and reduced cognitive throughput (single-task: F[1, 58] = 6.425, p = 0.014; dual-task: F[1, 58] = 28.152, p < 0.001). Both groups also exhibited reduced DTE on gait speed (F[1, 58] = 8.066, p = 0.006), response accuracy (F[1, 58] = 4.123, p = 0.047), and cognitive throughput (F[1, 58] = 6.807, p = 0.012). Gait responders and non-responders did not differ (all p > 0.05), but cognitive responders completed fewer years of education (t(58) = 2.114, p = 0.039) and better information processing speed (t(58) = -2.265, p = 0.027) than cognitive non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: The RESULTS: indicate that both VRTT and CTT may acutely improve gait and cognition. Therefore, older adults will likely benefit from participating in either type of exercise. The study also provides evidence that baseline cognition can impact training effects on DTE on cognition.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help