Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Exercise therapy plus manual therapy improves acromiohumeral distance measured by real-time ultrasound in overhead athletes with shoulder impingement syndrome
Sharma S, Sharma S, Sharma RK, Jain A
Postepy Rehabilitacji [Advances in Rehabilitation] 2022;36(3):1-10
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS), characterized by decreased acromiohumeral distance (AHD), is a promising objective outcome measure with both clinical and research utility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of combining exercise therapy and manual therapy with motor control exercise on AHD in overhead athletes with SIS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten overhead athletes with clinically diagnosed SIS were randomly assigned to two groups. The exercise therapy plus manual therapy (ET plus MT) group received the exercise therapy plus manual therapy regime, and the motor control exercises (MCE) group followed the motor control exercise protocol. Both groups underwent eight weeks of intervention, and AHD was evaluated at three levels of abduction (0 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees) with real-time ultrasound. The AHD evaluation was performed at baseline and at end of intervention (week 8). RESULTS: AHD improvement was noted at all three levels only in the ET plus MT group and the mean difference was found to be 2.62 +/- 0.18 mm (0 degrees), 3.28 +/- 0.40 mm (45 degrees) and 3.77 +/- 0.30 mm (60 degrees). Statistical analysis performed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA (3 x 2) revealed significant group effects for AHD (0 degrees: F (2, 1.10) = 0.76, p < 0.001; 45 degrees: F (2, 0.98) = 0.80, p < 0.001; 60 degrees: F (2, 0.95) = 0.84, p < 0.001). Time effect and interaction effects were also found to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: ET plus MT appears to be a more effective rehabilitation tool than MCE since it improves AHD at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees in overhead athletes with SIS.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help