Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Bodyblade training in athletes with traumatic anterior shoulder instability
Pulido V, Alvar B, Behm D
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 2023 Feb;18(1):188-198
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: The Bodyblade has the potential of enhancing conservative management of Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability (TASI). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare three different protocols: Traditional, Bodyblade, and Mixed (Traditional and Bodyblade) for shoulder rehabilitation on athletes with TASI. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized-controlled longitudinal training study. METHODS: Thirty-seven athletes (age 19.9 +/- 2.0 years) were allocated into Traditional, Bodyblade, and Mixed (Traditional/Bodyblade) training groups (3x week for 8-weeks). The traditional group used resistance bands (10 to 15 repetitions). The Bodyblade group transitioned from classic to the pro model (30 to 60-s repetitions). The mixed group converted from the traditional (weeks 1 to 4) to the Bodyblade (weeks 5 to 8) protocol. Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI) and the UQYBT were evaluated at baseline, mid-test, post-test, and at a three-month follow-up. A repeated-measures ANOVA design evaluated within and between-group differences. RESULTS: All three groups significantly (p = 0.001, eta2: 0.496) exceeded WOSI baseline scores (at all timepoints) with training (Traditional: 45.6%, 59.4%, and 59.7%, Bodyblade: 26.6%, 56.5%, and 58.4%, Mixed: 35.9%, 43.3% and 50.4% respectively). Additionally, there was a significant (p = 0.001, eta2: 0.607) effect for time with mid-test, post-test and follow-up exceeding baseline scores by 35.2%, 53.2% and 43.7%, respectively. The Traditional and Bodyblade groups (p = 0.049, eta2: 0.130) exceeded the Mixed group UQYBT at post-test (8.4%) and at three-month follow-up (19.6%). A main effect (p = 0.03, eta2: 0.241) for time indicated that WOSI mid-test, post-test and follow-up exceeded the baseline scores by 4.3%, 6.3% and 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: All three training groups improved their scores on the WOSI. The Traditional and Bodyblade groups demonstrated significant improvements in UQYBT inferolateral reach scores at post-test and three-month follow-up compared to the Mixed group. These findings could lend further credibility to the role of the Bodyblade as an early to intermediate rehabilitation tool. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help