Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Despite equivalent clinical outcomes, patients report less satisfaction with telerehabilitation versus standard in-office rehabilitation after arthroscopic meniscectomy: a randomized controlled trial |
Mojica ES, Vasavada K, Hurley ET, Lin CC, Buzin S, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Alaia MJ, Strauss EJ, Jazrawi LM, Campbell KA |
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation 2023 Feb;5(2):e395-e401 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
PURPOSE: To evaluate functional outcomes and satisfaction in patients who underwent telerehabilitation (telerehab) compared with in-person rehabilitation after arthroscopic meniscectomy. METHODS: A randomized-controlled trial was conducted including patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic meniscectomy for meniscal injury by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons between September 2020 and October 2021. Patients were randomized to receive telerehab, defined as exercises and stretches provided by trained physical therapists over a synchronous face-to-face video visit or in-person rehabilitation for their postoperative course. International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) score and satisfaction metrics were collected at baseline and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Analysis was conducted on 60 patients with 3 month follow-up outcomes. There were no significant differences in IKDC scores between groups at baseline (p = 0.211) and 3 months' postoperatively (p = 0.065). Patients were more likely to report being satisfied with their rehabilitation group 73% versus 100% (p = 0.044) if there were in the in-person group. Satisfaction differed significantly between the 2 groups at the end of their rehabilitation course, and only 64% of those in the telerehab group would elect to undergo telerehab again for future indications. Furthermore, they believed that future rehabilitation would benefit from a hybrid model. CONCLUSIONS: Telerehab showed no difference versus traditional in-person rehabilitation in terms of functional outcomes up to 3 months after arthroscopic meniscectomy. However, patients were less satisfied with telerehab. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, randomized controlled trial.
|