Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of active physiotherapy with positive airway pressure on pulmonary atelectasis after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled study
Baneton S, Dauvergne JE, Gouillet C, Cartron E, Volteau C, Nicolet J, Corne F, Rozec B
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2023 Sep;37(9):1668-1676
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the effect of active work with positive airway pressure (PAP) in addition to chest physiotherapy (CP) on pulmonary atelectasis (PA) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study. SETTING: At a single-center tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, or both), and presenting with PA after tracheal extubation on postoperative days 1 or 2, were randomized from November 2014 to September 2016. INTERVENTION: Three days of CP, twice daily, associated with active work with PAP effect (intervention group) versus CP alone (control group). Pulmonary atelectasis was assessed by using the radiologic atelectasis score (RAS) measured from daily chest x-rays. All radiographs were reviewed blindly. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among included patients, 79 (99%) completed the trial. The primary outcome was mean RAS on day 2 after inclusion. It was significantly lower in the intervention group (mean difference and 95% CI -1.1 (-1.6 to -0.6), p < 0.001). The secondary outcomes were the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure measured before and after CP and clinical variables. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure was significantly higher in the intervention group on day 2 (7.7 (95% CI 3.0 to 12.5) cmH2O, p = 0.002). The respiratory rate was lower in the intervention group (-3.2 (95% CI -4.8 to -1.6) breaths/min, p < 0.001) on day 2. No differences were found between the 2 groups for percutaneous oxygen saturation/oxygen requirement ratio, heart rate, pain, and dyspnea scores. CONCLUSIONS: Active work with the PAP effect, combined with CP, significantly decreased the RAS of patients undergoing cardiac surgery after 2 days of CP, with no differences observed in clinically relevant parameters.
Copyright by WB Saunders Company.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help