OBJECTIVE: Limb apraxia, a complication of stroke, causes difficulties in performing activities of daily living (ADL). To date, there are no studies on the effectiveness of limb apraxia interventions. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of limb apraxia interventions in reducing its severity and improving ADL. METHODS: We conducted a search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to limb apraxia till December 2021 using the databases of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. We measured the outcome variables in the subgroups of total apraxia (TA), ideational apraxia (IA), ideomotor apraxia (IMA), and ADL. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the quality. RESULTS: Five RCTs were selected, and of the 310 participants, 155 were in the experimental and 155 in the control group. A random-effects model was used for the effect size distribution. The limb apraxia intervention methods included gesture and strategy training (three and two studies, respectively). The effect sizes of the outcome variables in the subgroups were small for the TA and IA, with 0.475 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.151 to 1.102; p = 0.137) and 0.289 (95% CI -0.144 to 0.722; p = 0.191), respectively. IMA had a medium effect size of 0.731 (95% CI -0.062 to 1.525; p = 0.071), not statistically significant, whereas ADL effect size was small and statistically significant, 0.416 (95% CI 0.159 to 0.673; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Gesture and strategy training had statistically significant effects on ADL as limb apraxia interventions. Therefore, the effectiveness of the apraxia interventions needs to be further evaluated through continuous RCTs.
Copyright by WB Saunders Company.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher