Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of sensorimotor training on pelvic stability and balance in runners
de Freitas LJ, Ignacio SM, Bonfim TR
Fisioterapia em Movimento [Physical Therapy in Movement] 2021;34:e34125
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: Running has increased significantly in recent years due to its benefits and practicality. However, like any sport, running poses a risk of injury, leading to the need for clinical intervention and even its practitioners quitting the sport. Therefore, preventive strategies seeking to minimize the occurrence and consequences of such risk factors in these athletes are pivotal. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the preventive effects of a sensorimotor training protocol on the balance and pelvic stability of runners. METHODS: The study sample consisted of fourteen 10-km runners of both genders divided into two groups: the control group (CG) and the sensorimotor training group (SMTG). Both groups were evaluated using the single-leg stance test (static balance), Trendelenburg test (pelvic stability), and hop test (dynamic balance). The SMTG underwent 16 interventions, while the CG did not receive any intervention. RESULTS: The SMTG showed a significant increase in the permanence time of the single-leg stance test (p < 0.05) and a reduction in knee valgus during impulse and landing moments of the single hop test only in the right lower limb (p < 0.05), while the CG showed no significant difference in all tests applied (p > 0.05). Regarding pelvic stability, there was no significant difference in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: The proposed protocol significantly improved the static balance of the SMTG, but not the pelvic stability.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help