Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

A comparative analysis of energy expenditure and substrate metabolism in male university students with overweight/obesity: Tabata versus HIIT and MICT
Fan C, Cheng L, Wang Y, Peng D, Li F, Han Y, Wang H
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024 Feb 27;15(1323093):Epub
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: Exploring the energy expenditure and substrate metabolism data during exercise, 10-minute recovery, and 20-minute recovery phases in Tabata, HIIT (High-Intensity Interval Training), and MICT (Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training). This study explores the scientific aspects of weight reduction strategies, examining energy expenditure and substrate metabolism from various training perspectives. The aim is to establish a theoretical foundation for tailoring targeted exercise plans for individuals within the population with overweight/obesity. METHODS: This study used an experimental design with fifteen male university students with overweight/obesity. Participants underwent random testing with Tabata, HIIT, and MICT. Tabata involved eight sets of 20 seconds exercise and 10 seconds rest, totaling 4 minutes. HIIT included four sets of power cycling: 3 minutes at 80% VO2max intensity followed by 2 minutes at 20% VO2max. MICT comprised 30 minutes of exercise at 50% VO2max intensity. Gas metabolism indices were continuously measured. Subsequently, fat and glucose oxidation rates, along with energy expenditure, were calculated for each exercise type. RESULTS: During both the exercise and recovery phases, the Tabata group exhibited a significantly higher fat oxidation rate of (0.27 +/- 0.03 g/min) compared to the HIIT group (0.20 +/- 0.04 g/min, p < 0.05) and the MICT group (0.20 +/- 0.03 g/min, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the HIIT and MICT groups (p = 0.854). In terms of energy expenditure rate, the Tabata group maintained a substantially elevated level at 5.76 +/- 0.74 kcal/min compared to the HIIT group (4.81 +/- 0.25 kcal/min, p < 0.01) and the MICT group (3.45 +/- 0.25 kcal/min, p < 0.001). Additionally, the energy expenditure rate of the HIIT group surpassed that of the MICT group significantly (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study finds that male college students with overweight/obesity in both exercise and recovery, Tabata group has lower fat and glucose oxidation rates, and energy expenditure compared to HIIT and MICT groups. However, over the entire process, Tabata still exhibits significantly higher rates in these aspects than HIIT and MICT. Despite a shorter exercise duration, Tabata shows a noticeable "time-efficiency" advantage. Tabata can be used as an efficient short-term weight loss exercise program for male college students with overweight/obesity.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help