Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Dry needling versus manual therapy for patients with mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Pandya J, Puentedura EJ, Koppenhaver S, Cleland J
The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2024 Apr;54(4):1-12
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short- and intermediate-term effects of dry needling to manual therapy on pain, disability, function, and patient-perceived improvement in patients with mechanical neck pain. DESIGN: A single (therapist) blinded randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients (mean +/- SD age, 50.74 +/- 13.81) were randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups: (1) dry needling and therapeutic exercises (DN plus Exercises) and (2) manual therapy and therapeutic exercises (MT plus Exercises). Both groups received 7 treatment sessions over a maximum of 6 weeks. Outcome measures, collected at baseline, 2 weeks, discharge (7th treatment session), and 3 months after discharge, were as follows: Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric pain-rating scale (NPRS), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), global rating of change (GROC), Fear-Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ), and Deep Neck Flexor Endurance Test (DNFET). Data were analyzed with mixed-model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), using pretest scores as covariates, and a Mann-Whitney U test for GROC scores. RESULTS: The ANCOVA revealed significant group-by-time interaction for all variables. Significant between-group differences, favoring MT plus Exercises, were observed at all 3 time points on the NDI (2 weeks: F1,446 = 172.68, p <= 0.001, (Formula: see text) = 0.27; discharge: F1,446 = 254.15, p <= 0.001, (Formula: see text) = 0.36; and 3 months: F1,446 = 339.40, p <= 0.001, (Formula: see text) = 0.43). Results for the MT plus Exercises group exceeded recommended minimal clinically important difference for all variables, at all follow-up points. CONCLUSION: MT plus Exercises was more effective, both in the short term and intermediate term, than DN plus Exercises in reducing pain, disability, and improving function in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help