OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to synthesize the evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in people with nontraumatic degenerative meniscal pathology, comparing physical therapist interventions versus or combined with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). METHODS: Seven electronic databases were searched. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Data synthesis was performed with random-effects network meta-analysis, and results were summarized using the standardized mean differences. RESULTS: From 2,103 studies, 10 RCTs comprising 1,411 individuals were included. Ninety percent of the selected RCTs were classified as good quality according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. All interventions (physical therapist interventions, APM, and APM plus physical therapist interventions) showed reduced pain and physical impairments at 3 months follow-up. However, when a physical therapist intervention was included, greater reductions in pain at rest (APM versus physical therapist interventions 0.73 (95% CI 0.20 to 1.26); APM versus APM plus physical therapist interventions 0.59 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.03)) and greater increases in the strength of knee extensor muscles (APM versus physical therapist interventions 0.44 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.80); APM versus APM plus physical therapist interventions 0.73 (95% CI 0.29 to 1.16)) were observed at 3 months. In contrast, no differences were found between treatments beyond 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapist interventions based on exercise programs demonstrate superior short-term outcomes in pain reduction and knee extensor strength compared to surgical treatment.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher