Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Acute effects of in-hospital resistance training on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Nunez-Cortes R, Lopez-Bueno L, Lopez-Bueno R, Cuenca-Martinez F, Suso-Marti L, Silvestre A, Casana J, Cruz-Montecinos C, Andersen LL, Calatayud J |
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2024 May;103(5):401-409 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the acute responses, in the in-hospital setting, of intensive elastic resistance training on physical function, pain, psychosocial variables, and inflammatory markers in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. DESIGN: In a randomized controlled trial, 40 patients with total knee arthroplasty (>= 55 yrs) were assigned to either (1) the intervention group (elastic resistance strengthening) or (2) a control group (conventional protocol). Patients performed three sessions in the hospital at 24, 48, and 72 hrs after total knee arthroplasty. Outcome measures included: self-administered physical function, pain intensity, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, range of motion, perceived change, test timed up and go, knee joint effusion, isometric strength, pressure pain thresholds, and inflammatory markers (levels of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein). RESULTS: The mixed analysis of variance model showed a significant group*time interaction in favor of the intervention group with a large effect size for kinesiophobia (eta p 2 = 0.308, p < 0.001), catastrophizing (eta p 2 = 0.242, p < 0.001), and passive range of motion flexion (eta p 2 = 0.167, p < 0.001) and a moderate effect size for physical function (eta p 2 = 0.103, p = 0.004), pain intensity (eta p 2 = 0.139, p < 0.001), timed up and go (eta p 2 = 0.132, p = 0.001), self-efficacy (eta p 2 = 0.074, p = 0.016), active range of motion flexion (eta p 2 = 0.121, p = 0.002), levels of procalcitonin (eta p 2 = 0.099, p = 0.005), and C-reactive protein (eta p 2 = 0.106, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Three sessions of intensive elastic resistance training improve physical function, perceived pain, psychosocial variables, and inflammatory markers during the hospitalization period after total knee arthroplasty.
|