Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparison of the effectiveness of two different Kinesio Taping techniques added to exercises in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: randomized controlled trial, double-blind, parallel groups [with consumer summary]
Sahin M-A, Cigdem-Karacay B, Konar N-M, Tuncay F
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2024 Sep;105(9):1657-1665
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of I-tape and Button Hole Kinesio Taping (KT) techniques added to exercises in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled blinded study. SETTING: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic PARTICIPANTS: A total of 108 patients (165 wrists) diagnosed with CTS INTERVENTIONS: Button hole technique (BG), I band technique (IG), and exercices (CG). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analogue scale (VAS), Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4), Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire (BCTQ), and Jamar dynamometer. Median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP), compound muscle action potential (CMAP), median distal sensory latency (DSL), median distal motor latency (DML), sensory conduction velocity, and motor conduction velocity were recorded. Measurements were made at baseline, week 3, and week 12. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were in each group. Significant statistical improvements in VAS and DN4 scores were found in the BG and IG compared with CG (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvements in hand grip strength were observed in the IG compared to the CG (p < 0.05). Significant improvements in DML levels and motor conduction velocity were observed in the BG and IG compared to the CG (p < 0.05). A significant increase in sensory conduction velocity was detected in the BG compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both KT techniques are effective in terms of pain, functionality, symptom severity, grip strength and electrophysiologically. The button hole technique was more effective in DSL, sensory conduction velocity, CMAP amplitude and SNAP.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help