Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
High-intensity interval versus moderate-intensity continuous cycling training in Parkinson's disease: a randomized trial [with consumer summary] |
Kathia MM, Duplea S-G, Bommarito JC, Hinks A, Leake E, Shannon J, Pitman J, Khangura PK, Coates AM, Slysz JT, Katerberg C, McCarthy DG, Beedie T, Malcolm R, Witton LA, Connolly B, Burr JF, Vallis LA, Power GA, Millar PJ |
Journal of Applied Physiology 2024 Sep;137(3):603-615 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
Exercise training is recommended to improve quality of life in those living with Parkinson's Disease (PD); however, the optimal prescription to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and disease-related motor symptoms remains unknown. Twenty-nine participants with PD were randomly allocated to either 10-weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) (n = 15; 6 female) or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) (n = 14; 5 female). The primary outcome was the change in maximal oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Secondary outcomes included changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III motor score, Parkinson's Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16), resting and exercise cardiovascular measures, gait, balance, and knee extensor strength and fatigability. Exercise training increased VO2peak (main effect of time, p < 0.01), with a clinically-meaningful difference in the change following HIIT versus MICT (3.7 +/- 3.7 versus 1.7 +/- 3.2 ml/kg/min, p = 0.099). The UPDRS motor score improved over time (p < 0.001) but without any differences between HIIT versus MICT (-9.7 +/- 1.3 versus -8.4 +/- 1.4, p = 0.51). Self-reported subjective fatigue (PFS-16) decreased over time (p < 0.01) but was similar between HIIT and MICT groups (p = 0.6). Gait, balance, blood pressure, and heart rate were unchanged with training (all p > 0.09). Knee extensor strength increased over time (p = 0.03) but did not differ between HIIT versus MICT (8.2 +/- 5.9 versus 11.7 +/- 6.2 Nm, p = 0.69). HIIT alone increased muscular endurance of the knee extensors during an isotonic task to failure (p = 0.04). In participants with PD, HIIT and MICT both increased VO2peak and led to improvements in motor symptoms and perceived fatigue; HIIT may offer the potential for larger changes in VO2peak and reduced knee extensor fatigability.
|