Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Telerehabilitation improves cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness and body composition in older people with post-COVID-19 syndrome
Pleguezuelos E, Del Carmen A, Moreno E, Serra-Prat M, Serra-Paya N, Garnacho-Castano MV
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2024 Oct;15(5):1785-1796
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: The effects of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome on the cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in older people are of utmost relevance. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a 12-week telerehabilitation programme on cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness and body composition in older patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. METHODS: One hundred twenty older patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome were randomly assigned to one of two groups: patients who carried out the telerehabilitation programme (n = 60; age 65.0 +/- 5.2; female 14.2%) and a control group (n = 60; age 64.3 +/- 5.0; female 24.5%). An incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing, isokinetic strength test, and bioelectrical impedance analysis were performed to compare cardiorespiratory and muscle strength responses and body composition between telerehabilitation and control groups. RESULTS: A significant increase in the cardiopulmonary exercise testing duration was found in the telerehabilitation group compared to the control group (mean difference 88.9 s, p = 0.001). Peak oxygen uptake increased in the telerehabilitation group (mean difference 3.0 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001) and control group (mean difference 1.9 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001). Power output in cycle ergometer (mean difference 25.9 watts, p < 0.001), fat free mass (mean difference 2.1 kg, p = 0.004), soft lean mass (mean difference 2.1 kg, p = 0.003), and skeletal muscle mass (mean difference 1.4 kg, p = 0.003) only increased in the telerehabilitation group. A significant increase in the power output was observed in the telerehabilitation group compared with the control group in both lower limbs after isokinetic strength test of the leg extension at a speed of 60 degrees (right mean difference 18.7 watts, p = 0.012; left mean difference 15.3 watts, p = 0.010). The peak torque of right leg extension increased only in the telerehabilitation group after isokinetic strength test at a speed of 60 degrees (mean difference 13.1 Nm, p < 0.001). A significant increase in the power output was observed in the telerehabilitation group compared with the control group in the left leg extension after isokinetic strength test at a speed of 180degree (mean difference 30.2 watts, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The telerehabilitation programme improved cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and body composition in older patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome to a greater extent than a control group. The telerehabilitation programmes may be an alternative to improve the sequelae of post-COVID-19 syndrome in older patients.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help