Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of variation in exercise training load on cognitive performances and neurotrophic biomarkers in patients with coronary artery disease [with consumer summary]
Boidin M, Gregoire C-A, Gagnon C, Thorin-Trescases N, Thorin E, Nigam A, Juneau M, Guillaume A, Tremblay J, Gayda M, Bherer L
Journal of Applied Physiology 2024 Nov;137(5):1158-1167
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: This study compared the effects of linear (LP) and non-linear (NLP) training periodization on resting cognitive functions, neurotrophic biomarkers (brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)), and cathepsin-B in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Forty-four patients with CAD reported to our laboratory on two occasions to undergo testing procedures before and after training sessions, and were then blindly randomized to NLP or LP for 36 training sessions. Visit 1 included blood samples and a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing to get maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak). Visit 2 included cognitive functions assessment. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients completed the study (LP: n = 20, NLP: n = 19), with no observed changes in cognitive performances after the training intervention in either group. IGF-1 concentration decreased in both groups (time-effect: p < 0.001), while BDNF concentration increased (time-effect: p < 0.05) without interaction (p = 0.17 and p = 0.65, respectively), and cathepsin-B did not change after the intervention (p > 0.05). Associations were found between deltaVO2peak and deltaBDNF (R2 0.18, p = 0.04), and deltaIGF-1 and delta short-term/working memory (R2 0.17, p = 0.01) in the pooled sample, with delta IGF-1 and deltaBDNF accounting for 10% of the variance in delta short-term/working memory. In the LP group, associations were found between deltaVO2peak and deltaBDNF (R2 0.45, p = 0.02), deltaBDNF and delta short-term/working memory (R2 0.62, p = 0.004), deltaIGF-1 and delta short-term/working memory (R2 0.31, p = 0.01), and delta IGF-1 and delta executive function (R2 0.22, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This finding highlights the potential importance of monitoring and targeting BDNF and IGF-1 concentration as potential biomarkers for improving short-term and working memory in the population with CAD.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help