Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

A comparative study between conventional diaphragmatic breathing exercise and virtual reality-based diaphragmatic breathing exercise on quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized control trial
Shirodkar S, Deo M
Archives of Medicine & Health Sciences 2024 Aug;12(2):171-175
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breathing exercise is an exercise intended to promote effective and healthy breathing and breathing control. Virtual reality (VR) is defined as a computer-generated simulation, such as a set of images and sounds that represent a real place or situation that can be interacted within a seemingly real or physical way by a person using special electronic equipment. Breathing exercises with VR have shown benefits over conventional diaphragmatic breathing exercises in normal individuals in many new studies. We propose the use of a novel VR-based approach as a respiratory biofeedback to improve breathing patterns in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, decrease their work of breathing, and improve breathing control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized controlled study involving 72 COPD patients divided into two groups of 36 in each, the control and experimental groups performed a short 5 min breathing exercise for 6 consecutive days. In experimental group patients performed breathing exercise with VR goggles while in controls they performed without VR goggles. RESULTS: Both the control and experimental groups showed improved changes in vitals and better quality of life, but not statistically as significant when compared to each other. CONCLUSION: Future studies need to address the long-term effects and stability of the results with a larger sample size, compare the approach with the existing treatments, and make the required smaller changes to the program for better outcomes.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help