Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Multicomponent versus aerobic exercise intervention: effects on hemodynamic, physical fitness and quality of life in adult and elderly cardiovascular disease patients: a randomized controlled study
Poli L, Greco G, Cataldi S, Ciccone MM, De Giosa A, Fischetti F
Heliyon 2024 Aug;10(16):e36200
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a leading cause of mortality globally, emphasizing the need for effective preventive measures. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a multicomponent compared to an aerobic training program on the hemodynamic parameters, physical fitness, psychophysical health status and quality of life (QoL) of adults and elderly with stabilized CVDs. METHODS: Thirty-three subjects (19M and 14F; age 69.5 +/- 4.9 years; BMI 27.34 +/- 4.95 kg/m2) suffering from CVDs voluntarily participated in this 10-week randomized controlled study and were allocated into three groups: multicomponent training group (MTG; 6M, 6F; cardiorespiratory, resistance, flexibility and breathing exercises; 60, 2d.wk-1), aerobic training group (ATG; 7M, 5F; aerobic-only training; 60, 2d.wk-1) or a wait-list control group (CG; 6M, 3F; no PA). Hemodynamic parameters were assessed through resting hearth rate (RHR) and peripheral-systolic and diastolic blood pressure (P-SBP/P-DBP). Physical fitness was assessed via a 30 chair stand test (30CST), timed up and go (TUG) test, handgrip strength (HGS) test, and 2 step test (TMST). The health status, QoL and enjoyment were evaluated with short form-12 (SF-12), world health organization quality of life-bref (WHOQoL-bref) and physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES), respectively. RESULTS: After the intervention, MTG showed significant improvements in hemodynamic parameters (95%CI RHR 2.76 to 9.07; P-SBP 3.28 to 13.71; P-DBP 3.56 to 8.94; p < 0.001), physical fitness (95% CI 30CST 4.42 to -1.90; TUG 0.56 to 1.58; TMST 35.24 to -18.58; Dominant HGS 4.00 to -1.65; Undominant HGS 2.87 to -0.79, p < 0.001) and enjoyment (PACES 15.18 to -5.48, p < 0.001) compared to CG; ATG showed significant improvement in hemodynamic parameters (95% CI RHR 1.76 to 8.07; P-SBP 3.19 to 13.63; P-DBP 4.47 to 9.85, p < 0.001), physical fitness (95% CI 30CST 2.59 to -0.07; TUG 0.03 to 1.05; Dominant HGS 2.42 to -0.07, p < 0.05; TMST 36.08 to -19.41, p < 0.001) and enjoyment (PACES 14.68 to -4.98, p < 0.001) compared to CG. No significant changes were observed in QoL and SF-12 (p > 0.05). Significant differences between MTG and ATG were only found in physical fitness variables (95% CI 30CST 3.21 to -0.45, p < 0.01; Dominant HGS 0.00 to 3.00, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings showed significant improvements in hemodynamic parameters and physical fitness suggesting the effectiveness of the multicomponent exercise program, similar to aerobic-only training, and greater efficacy for lower limb strength and dominant hand grip strength in adults and elderly with stabilized CVDs. Both exercise groups showed similar levels of enjoyment.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help