Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Interventions for psychiatric disorders among university students: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Huang H, Huang S, Chen S, Gao X, Cai J, Feng Y, Liu J, Su X, Qiu J, Zhang S, Xu Y, Liu Z, Wang T, Zeng F
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 2024 Jan-Mar;24(1):100431
systematic review

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are considered to be the main reason for the increase of the disease burden. College students seem to be more vulnerable to the adverse effects of stress, which makes them more at risk of suffering from mental disorders. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the credibility of published evidence regarding the effects of interventions on mental disorders among university students. METHODS: To identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating the effects of interventions on mental disorders in the university student population, extensive searches were carried out in databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database, spanning from inception to July 21, 2023. Subsequently, a thorough reanalysis of crucial parameters such as summary effect estimates, 95% confidence intervals, heterogeneity I2 statistic, 95% prediction intervals, small-study effects, and excess significance bias was performed for each meta-analysis found. RESULTS: Nineteen articles involving 74 meta-analyses were included. Our grading of the current evidence showed that interventions based on exercise, Cognitive-behavioural Intervention (CBI), mindfulness-based interventions (MBI), and other interventions like mood and anxiety interventions (MAI) were effective whereas exercise intervention had the highest effect size for both depression and anxiety among university students. However, the credibility of the evidence was weak for most studies. Besides, suggestive evidence was observed for the positive effects of CBI on sleep disturbance (SMD -0.603, 95% CI -0.916 to -0.290; p-random effects < 0.01) and MAI on anxiety (Hedges'g -0.198, 95% CI -0.302 to 0.094; p -random effects < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, it appears that exercise interventions, CBI, and MAI have the potential to alleviate symptoms related to mental disorders. Despite the overall weak credibility of the evidence and the strength of the associations, these interventions offer a promising avenue for further exploration and research in the future. More high-quality randomized controlled trials should be taken into account to verify the effects of these interventions on various mental disorders.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help