Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Motor imagery priming improves activity and impairment outcomes in people after stroke but the effects of other types of priming are unclear: a systematic review [with consumer summary]
Dorsch S, Nicholson V, Roman E, Fanayan E, Chagpar S
Journal of Physiotherapy 2024 Oct;70(4):275-287
systematic review

QUESTION: In stroke rehabilitation, what is the effect of adding non-stimulation-based priming prior to task-specific practice on activity and motor impairment outcomes compared with task-specific practice alone? DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Adult stroke survivors. INTERVENTION: The experimental groups completed a non-stimulation priming intervention prior to task-specific practice. The priming interventions were: motor imagery; action observation; combined motor imagery and action observation; mirror therapy; movement-based priming; and aerobic exercise-based priming. The control groups completed task-specific practice alone. OUTCOME MEASURES: Upper and lower limb activity and motor impairment. RESULTS: Twenty-four trials involving 803 participants were included in this systematic review. Twenty trials were included in the meta-analyses of activity outcomes and 11 trials in the meta-analyses of impairment outcomes. Four trials examined the effect of motor imagery priming prior to task-specific practice on activity outcomes (SMD 0.48, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.82). Three trials examined the effect of motor imagery priming prior to task-specific practice on motor impairment outcomes (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.89). Nine trials examined the effect of action observation priming prior to task-specific practice on activity outcomes (SMD 0.18, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.41). Two trials examined the effect of movement-based priming prior to task-specific practice on activity outcomes (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.42). Three trials examined the effect of aerobic exercise priming prior to task-specific practice on activity outcomes (SMD 0.30, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.80). The quality of the evidence was low to moderate. CONCLUSION: In stroke rehabilitation, motor imagery priming implemented prior to task-specific training has a very small to large effect on activity and motor impairment outcomes. Action observation priming implemented prior to task-specific training has a negligible to small effect on activity outcomes. Movement-based and aerobic exercise-based priming do not have any clear effect on outcomes. REGISTRATION: CRD42020093519.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help