Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Treatment modalities for patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type II: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [with consumer summary]
Goudman L, Russo M, Pilitsis JG, Eldabe S, Duarte RV, Billot M, Roulaud M, Rigoard P, Moens M
Communications Medicine 2025 Mar 5;5:63
systematic review

BACKGROUND: Appropriate management of patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T2) remains challenging. The need for robust evidence for treatment modalities is urgently pressing. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare different treatment modalities for patients with PSPS-T2 on pain intensity. METHODS: The study protocol was prospectively registered (PROSPERO; CRD42022360160). Four different databases were consulted from database inception to December 18th, 2023. Randomised controlled trials of interventions for PSPS-T2 were included. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess risk of bias. A NMA with standardized mean differences was calculated with pairwise comparisons between all treatment modalities. RESULTS: Here we include 49 studies in the systematic review and 13 in NMA. A high risk of bias is indicated for 65.3% of the studies. Half of the studies investigate neuromodulation (mainly Spinal Cord Stimulation), 16 explore minimal invasive treatment options (predomitly epidural injections), 6 studies focus on conservative treatments (physiotherapy/cognitive training and medication) and 2 on reoperation. Comparison of neuromodulation versus a combination of conservative and minimal invasive options results in an effect size of 0.45 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.76), clearly favouring neuromodulation (z = 2.88; p = 0.004). Additionally, neuromodulation results in a standardised mean difference of 0.36 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.53) compared to placebo/sham (z 4.03; p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference is found between conservative options and neuromodulation. CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation, followed by conservative treatment options, seems to be the most effective treatment option to obtain pain relief in patients with PSPS-T2. Nevertheless, a personalized approach tailored to individual patient needs is essential for optimizing outcomes, since interventions should be adjusted based on the failure or success of prior therapies.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help