Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Trunk rotation, spinal deformity and appearance, health-related quality of life, and treatment adherence: secondary outcomes in a randomized controlled trial on conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Dufvenberg M, Charalampidis A, Diarbakerli E, Oberg B, Tropp H, Ahl AA, Moller H, Gerdhem P, Abbott A, on behalf of CONTRAIS Study Group
PLoS ONE 2025 Apr;20(4):e0320581
clinical trial
This trial has not yet been rated.

OBJECTIVE: To explore secondary outcomes at endpoint comparing treatments with adequate self-mediated physical activity combined with either night-time brace (NB), scoliosis-specific exercise (SSE), or adequate self-mediated physical activity alone (PA) in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: A longitudinal, prospective, multicenter RCT was conducted including 135 girls/boys, Cobb angle 25 to 40degree, 9 to 17 years, and >= 1-year remaining growth were randomly allocated into NB, SSE, or PA group. Endpoint was curve progression of <= 6degree (success) at skeletal maturity or > 6degree (failure). Outcomes included angle of trunk rotation (ATR), major curve Cobb angle, Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (pSAQ), Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r), EQ-5Dimensions Youth 3Levels (EQ-5D-Y-3L), and EQ-Visual-Analogue-Scale (EQ-VAS), adherence to treatment and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF). RESULTS: At endpoint, 122 patients were analyzed per protocol, mean age 12.7 (+/- 1.4) years, and mean Cobb angle 31degree (+/- 4.3). A significant difference in change for ATR favored NB group compared to SSE group -2.0 (95% CI -3.7 to -0.3). EQ-5D-Y-3L dimensions showed a significant difference in change with decrease in mobility (p = 0.031), and usual activities (p = 0.003) for SSE compared to NB and PA groups. Treatment adherence was adequate but slightly better in NB and PA groups compared to SSE on self-report (p = 0.012), and health care provider (HCP) report was better in PA compared to SSE group (p = 0.013). Higher motivation and capability explained 53% of the variability and gave better odds for higher adherence (OR 11.12, 95% CI 1.5 to 34.4; OR 7.23, 95% CI 2.9 to 43.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Night-time brace, scoliosis-specific exercise or physical activity interventions for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis showed small differences between groups in trunk rotation, spinal deformity and appearance, health-related quality of life, and treatment adherence but not likely reaching clinical relevance.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help