Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Wirksamkeit von gepulster magnetfeldtherapie bei patienten mit unspezifischen ruckenschmerzen -- eine systematische literaturubersicht (Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain and physical function in patients with non-specific low back pain: a systematic review) [German] |
| Kull P, Keilani M, Remer F, Crevenna R |
| Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 2025 Feb;175(1-2):11-19 |
| systematic review |
|
INTRODUCTION: Non-specific low back pain is a common and clinically significant condition with substantial socioeconomic implications. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has shown benefits in pain reduction and improvement of physical function in patients with pain-associated disorders like osteoarthritis. However, studies had heterogeneous settings. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of PEMF on pain and function on patients with non-specific low back pain. METHODS: A systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PEDro was performed (from inception until 15/5/2023). Outcome measures assessed pain and function. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials with 420 participants (n = 420) were included. The studies compared PEMF versus placebo-PEMF, PEMF and conventional physical therapy versus conventional physical therapy alone, PEMF and conventional physical therapy versus placebo-PEMF and conventional physical therapy, PEMF versus high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) versus conventional physical therapy, and osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) and PEMF versus PEMF alone versus placebo-PEMF versus OMT alone. Five of the nine included studies showed statistically significant pain reduction and improvement in physical function in comparison to their control groups (p < 0.05). There was substantial heterogeneity among the groups of the study, with a wide range of duration (10 to 30min), treatments per week (2 to 7/week), applied frequencies (3 to 50Hz), and intensities (2mT to 150mT). No serious adverse event had been reported in any study. The included studies showed solid methodological quality, with an overall score of 7.2 points according to the PEDro scale. CONCLUSION: PEMF therapy seems to be a safe and beneficial treatment option for non-specific low back pain, particularly if used as an addition to conventional physical therapy modalities. Future research should focus on standardized settings including assessment methods, treatment regimens, frequencies, and intensities.
|