Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Comparison of high- and low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome |
| Ceylan I, Kurtuncuoglu B, Tuncay F, Canli M, Alkan H, Tayfur A |
| Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira [Journal of the Brazilian Medical Association] 2025 May;71(3):e20241815 |
| clinical trial |
| 6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy administered at low versus high pressures in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized into two groups: low-dose group and high-dose group. Each patient underwent a total of four sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, administered once a week. The radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was delivered at 4.0 bars for the high-dose group and 1.5 bars for the low-dose group. Both groups received conventional physical therapy program consisting of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, paraffin wax, orthoses, and tendon gliding exercises, three times per week over a 4-week duration. Outcome measures included pain levels, hand grip strength, pinch strength, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, and nerve conduction studies. RESULTS: Both groups exhibited improvements across all measures, except for the nerve conduction studies parameters. In the intragroup analysis, statistically significant differences were observed with small-to-moderate effect sizes for median motor distal latency, median sensory nerve conduction velocity, median sensory distal latency, and the Boston functional status subscale, all favoring the high-dose group (p < 0.05). In the low-dose group, a statistically significant difference with a moderate effect size was noted solely for hand grip strength (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: High-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was significantly better than low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy with small-to-moderate effect sizes in the recovery of the function and nerve conduction studies parameters of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: The study was registered on the Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: NCT05681663).
|