Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

An investigation of the effects of cervical traction. Part 1: clinical effectiveness
Klaber Moffett JA, Hughes GI, Griffiths P
Clinical Rehabilitation 1990;4:205-211
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Cervical traction is one of the most common methods of treating neck and arm pain, but its effects are poorly understood. This study tested the hypothesis, firstly, that mechanical traction is effective in relieving clinical symptoms and, as a secondary part of a study described elsewhere, that the mechanism may be a reduction in muscle tension. One hundred patients with neck and arm pain were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: (1) weighted cervical traction (6 to 15 lbs) applied according to a technique commonly used by physiotherapists; (2) placebo traction, applied in exactly the same way, but producing a force of not more than 1 lb on the head. Both groups were given neck-care education. The weighted group tended to improve slightly more than the placebo group on measures of pain, sleep disturbance, social dysfunction, ADL and range of movement at the neck. No significant post-treatment differences were found between the two treatment groups except on flexion and right-side flexion.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help