Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Acupuncture for chronic low back pain in older adults: a randomized clinical trial [with consumer summary] |
| DeBar LL, Wellman RD, Justice M, Avins AL, Beyrouty M, Eng CM, Herman PM, Nielsen A, Pressman A, Stone KL, Teets RY, Cook AJ |
| JAMA Network Open 2025 Sep;8(9):e2531348 |
| clinical trial |
| This trial has not yet been rated. |
|
IMPORTANCE: The study was carried out to inform Medicare acupuncture coverage decisions addressing the gap in evidence on acupuncture effectiveness, specifically for older adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of standard acupuncture (SA) or SA plus maintenance (enhanced acupuncture (EA)) to improve CLBP-related disability relative to usual medical care (UMC) at 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization. Design, Setting, and PARTICIPANTS: This multisite, 3-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial of older adults with CLBP collected data from 4 US health care systems in 3 geographic areas and compared SA and EA treatment with UMC only. Study enrollment was conducted from August 12, 2021, to October 27, 2022; follow-up concluded on November 7, 2023. INTERVENTIONS: Both SA (8 to 15 treatment sessions over 12 weeks plus UMC) and EA (SA plus 4 to 6 maintenance sessions during the next 12 weeks) were provided by experienced, community-based licensed acupuncturists. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to the 3 groups. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was CLBP-related disability measured by a baseline-to-6-month change in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity and the percentage of participants with clinically meaningful (>= 30%) improvements. RESULTS: The trial identified 800 individuals who were randomized to 3 groups (mean (SD) age 73.6 (6.0) years; 496 females (62.0%)). At 6 months, RMDQ change scores were significantly better in both the SA and EA groups compared with the UMC only group (SAversus UMC: adjusted mean difference -1.0 (95% CI -1.9 to -0.1) and EAversus UMC: adjusted mean difference -1.5 (95% CI -2.5 to -0.6)). SA and EA change scores did not differ significantly from one another. The relative benefit of acupuncture compared with UMC on disability persisted at 12 months. Pain intensity exhibited a relative benefit of EA over SA at 6 months, and both acupuncture groups had significant improvement over UMC. The adjusted percentage with clinically meaningful improvements in RMDQ at 6 months was greater for SA (39.1% (95% CI 33.1% to 46.1%); adjusted relative risk 1.33 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.70)) and for EA (43.8% (95% CI 38.0% to 50.4%); adjusted relative risk 1.49 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.86)) compared with UMC (29.4% (95% CI 24.3% to 35.5%)) and persisted at 12 months. Rates of serious adverse events were low and similar among groups, with less than 1% that was possibly acupuncture-intervention related. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this randomized clinical trial of older adults with CLBP suggest that acupuncture needling provided greater improvements in back pain-related disability at 6 months and at 12 months compared with UMC alone. These findings support acupuncture needling as an effective and safe treatment option for older adults with CLBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04982315.
|