Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Are exercise booster sessions effective at preserving exercise-induced effects in people with multiple sclerosis? A randomised controlled trial: results from the MSBOOST trial
Taul-Madsen L, Hvid LG, Sellebjerg F, Romme Christensen J, Ratzer R, Sejbaek T, Bacher Svendsen K, Papp V, Hojsgaard Chow H, Lundbye-Jensen J, Dawes H, Dalgas U
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2026 Jul;29(8):934-942
clinical trial
This trial has not yet been rated.

OBJECTIVES: In people with multiple sclerosis (PWMS), exercise improves aerobic capacity and muscle strength which are key components of physical function and overall health status. However, the effects diminish after exercise cessation. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether exercise booster sessions (EBS) could preserve the exercise-induced improvements. DESIGN: Multicentre RCT. METHODS: Ninety-four PWMS performed 12weeks of aerobic-training (AT) or resistance-training (RT) and were subsequently randomised to receive EBS (two sessions every fifth week) (ATboost n = 24, RTboost n = 24) or usual-care (ATuc n = 20, or RTuc n = 26) for 40weeks. The primary outcome was physical function measured as a composite score of the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and five-time sit-to-stand test (5STS). Secondary outcomes were aerobic capacity and muscle strength. RESULTS: No between-group difference was observed in the composite score of 6MWT and 5STS (arbitrary unit) between ATboost and RTboost 0.00 (-0.20; 0.20). No between-group difference was observed for aerobic capacity (mL O2/kg/min) between ATboost and ATuc 1.1 (-1.9; 4.1), although a within-group change was observed for ATboost -1.9 (-4.0; 0.1), but not for ATuc -3.0 (-5.2; -0.8). No between-group difference was seen for muscle strength (Nm/kg) between RTboost and RTuc -0.04 (-0.36; 0.28). Also, no within-group change was observed for neither RTboost -0.07 (-0.30; 0.14) nor RTuc -0.04 (-0.27; 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: EBS had no apparent effect on preservation of physical function, aerobic capacity, or muscle strength in PWMS. Muscle strength was preserved regardless of group, whereas only ATboost preserved exercise-induced improvements in aerobic capacity.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help